
Crippen's charity cartoon
Francis Maude, Cabinet Office minister has just issued a green paper on “giving” in the hope of “building culture change” in our attitudes to charity. He wants us to change our donation habits to be more like the Americans where there is a competitiveness about charitable giving.
By making charitable giving more visible and competitive in the UK, his plan is to bring in more money to the charities who will be used to fill the holes created by public spending cuts. In a nutshell, the whole ‘Big Society’ concept is about communities, individuals and charities plugging the gaps created by the public spending cuts that are under way.
The reason that the success of the ‘Big Society’ will depend heavily upon Maude’s scheme becoming a reality is due to the fact that charities currently receive about £35m annually from the government (although perhaps another area for the chop?). This means that unless ordinary citizens put their hands deeper into their pockets and boost the income needed by charities to fulfil their new role, then the ‘Big Society’ won’t even get off the ground.
Another problen for this government is that charities don’t always have the same priorities that they have. In the UK, it’s been calculated that the most popular causes are for children, animals, cancer and lifeboats! Disability charities are amongst the causes that are least likely to arouse the public’s compassion (unsurprisingly groups and organisations OF disabled people don’t even figure in these statistics). It doesn’t help those disability charities, who will be expected to take over many of the community care duties, that the CONDEM’s have also been implying that a lot of people claiming to be disabled are most likely faking it!
There’s a ray of hope for all disabled people here though. By introducing this ‘scrounger’ element the CONDEMs have inadvertantly sabotaged a major part of their grand design by ensuring that the general public will be even more reluctant to give money to those charities that claim to support disabled people. These same charities that will be expected to fill this particular funding gap!
So, where does this leave us? If Maude’s scheme works by increasing the visibility of charitable giving and encouraging people to compete against each other to donate more, this will inevitably mean that the likes of Scope and Leonard Cheshire will be given more money to fill their coffers. They’re already aware that due to the cuts to benefits and the reduction in community services, they’ll be getting more disabled people unable to live anywhere other than in their care homes.
And more disabled people living in their care homes means yet more money pouring into their coffers and less disabled people on the streets. Less disabled people on the streets, using public transport, participating within mainstream education and doing all the things that other members of society take for granted means that we will soon fade from the public consiousness, hidden away as a distant, bad memory.
We’ve got to wake up to the fact that we’re fighting for our very lives here. We have to find a way to bring ALL disabled people together to challenge these changes and expose this monstrous government and it’s brutal, backward looking policies. Unless we do this, we have no future. We may even cease to exist as laws are changed about assisted suicide and society decides that it’s much more humane to have us all put down or killed at birth.
I’ve unashamedly taken a lot of the information needed for this blog from an excellent article by Peter Wilby in the Guardian. Please cut and paste the following link to read Peter’s article in full –
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/31/francis-maude-big-society-charity